What Do We Do With the Art of Monstrous Men?

Thoughts on What Nosotros Should Do with the Art of Monstrous Men

What Do Nosotros Do with the Art of Monstrous Men?

By Claire Dederer for The Paris Review

Having recently read Claire Dederer's slice for The Paris Review titled What Do Nosotros Do with the Art of Monstrous Men, a flurry of thoughts sprang to mind*.

The first of which was only that we detect it easy enough to split up ourselves from makers of our clothes and tech, who are oftentimes forced to work in inhumane conditions. We may take qualms with the mode companies that nosotros buy our food from or that transport united states from place to place damage the environs, but seldom do they charge per unit then highly when it comes to prioritising our outrage.

What is it specifically about individual people doing admittedly awful things that we discover so much more difficult to split up from the final product — or that we find easier to separate than entire systems which are morally or ethically decadent? And why should information technology finish at art? Why not go on strike until that manager with wandering hands from the accounts department has been dealt with?

With over 7 billion people on the planet, the existence of a small number of individuals in the entertainment manufacture committing heinous acts doesn't seem like such a big bargain. Peradventure it's the fact that these individuals in question too happen to be people of influence and celebrity that has led the states to exist fascinated by their deportment, having already removed "them" from "united states" by dint of their success. Or perhaps the trouble is that these individuals correspond the tip of the iceberg of these types of behaviours that exist not only in the lives of the rich and famous, who are constantly under scrutiny from the press and public, but everywhere from office blocks to county fairs. Mayhap we, the general public, are trying to panel ourselves by damning high-profile individuals, rather than addressing the endemic issues of our own, tangible lives.

It's interesting too how people are willing to engage in debates well-nigh whether or not to boycott a body of work because the person who created it is or was or turned out to be a deviant, when at the aforementioned time it's rarely suggested that nosotros "vote with our wallets" (as suggested by this commodity) when we hear about more than full general bug, like the huge inequalities betwixt male, female, white and non-white actors, for case.

Where was the industry boycott when Jennifer Lawrence spoke up about the gender pay gap in Hollywood? Why are we withal listening to music produced past Dr Luke later the Kesha lawsuit, and why did that lawsuit not lead to a wider debate about abuses of power in the music industry (which we all know exists, even without artists similar Lana Del Rey writing songs chosen Fucked my Way to the Superlative)?

If we boycott the work of everyone nosotros know to have washed something monstrous in their lives, how can we be certain that future generations volition continue to boycott it? In 100 years time, who's to say whether anybody in the audience of a Woody Allen retrospective would exist equipped with the knowledge to feel appropriately weird virtually going? If the boycotts are not sustained, are nosotros not just missing out because of our ain stubbornness to remove the artists from the art — especially in cases where the art was a collaborative effort?

What ought we do most the movies, novels, records, photographs, paintings and sculptures from previous generations, when sexual misconduct or racist behaviour was neither reported on nor received with the same attitude?

When British chiffonier ministers are losing their jobs over having touched a announcer'south knee 15 years ago, I tin can't imagine Charlie Chaplain (who was referred to with great admiration in the Paris Review piece) would be found as innocent as he's made out to exist. One wonders whether Shakespeare would have every bit make clean a slate every bit is required for his level of success in a modernistic setting. At what signal practice we retroactively forgive artists their actions and re-embrace their fine art?

Maybe ignorance really is bliss. I do non mean to suggest that allegations confronting the private artists should be glossed over — those should be taken every bit seriously as they are. Merely imagine if all art were anonymous? Or if all artists took a Banksy-esque approach to creating a public persona? What if we constitute out that Banksy was an anti-Semite in his interior life? Could nosotros still appreciate the sense of humor and satire of his work, or would nosotros lament the days of his anonymity?

To be quite clear: I absolutely do not condone the actions of the Harvey Weinsteins of the world. Without question he, and others who accept acted similarly, have abused their positions of power and trust in a way that can have serious consequences for the victims, and should as well accept serious consequences for the perpetrators. There is no excusing it.

However, in cases where the work produced was not facilitated by an act of "monstrousness", should we judge it so severely based on the incidental behaviours of certain persons who worked on it? Did Diane Keaton not as well, quite literally, play a huge part in the creation of Annie Hall? Volition Chloë Grace Mortez, Charlie Day and the countless other names on the credits of Louis C.Grand.'due south quashed film I Honey You lot, Daddy non be put out by it being pulled from theatres? Perchance I'm simply trying to discover a fashion to excuse myself for even so wanting to lookout man Shakespeare in Dearest twice a twelvemonth. Perhaps I'g only suggesting nosotros be more conscientious with our anger and outrage, and aim to sympathize the source of our reactions and the consequences of taking them out on anything or torso other than the perpetrator of monstrousness themselves.

* I would like to note that I had several broader concerns about the themes of Claire Dederer'south slice, however for the sake of succinctness I have chosen to concentrate on my reaction to the master topic of the article, rather than, say, Dederer'due south fixation on male/female disparities.

cayerwalouteemper2001.blogspot.com

Source: https://medium.com/@AliceBrace/thoughts-on-what-we-should-do-with-the-art-of-monstrous-men-560dc8f73bc8

Share this post